POST-APPROVAL STUDY of TRANSCAROTID ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION in PATIENTS With SIGNIFICANT CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE. The ROADSTER 2 Study.

Status: Completed
Location: See all (43) locations...
Study Type: Observational
SUMMARY

The ROADSTER 2 Study is intended to evaluate real world usage of the ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent when used with the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System by physicians of varying experience with the transcarotid technique.

Eligibility
Participation Requirements
Sex: All
Minimum Age: 18
Healthy Volunteers: f
View:

⁃ Patient must meet one of the following criteria regarding neurological symptom status and degree of stenosis:

⁃ Symptomatic: Stenosis must be \>50% as determined by an angiogram and the patient has a history of stroke (minor or non-disabling; NIHSS ≤4 or mRS ≤2), TIA and/or amaurosis fugax within 180 days of the procedure procedure ipsilateral to the carotid artery to be stented.

⁃ OR Asymptomatic: Stenosis must be \>80% as determined by angiogram without any neurological symptoms within the prior 180 days.

⁃ Target vessel must meet all requirements for ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System and ENROUTE Stent System (refer to IFU for requirements).

⁃ Patient has a discrete lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA).

⁃ Patient is ≥18 years of age.

⁃ Patient understands the nature of the procedure and has provided a signed informed consent using a form that has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site prior to the procedure. This will be obtained prior to participation in the study.

⁃ Patient is willing to comply with the protocol requirements and return to the treatment center for all required clinical evaluations.

⁃ Patient must have a life expectancy ≥ 3 years at the time of the index procedure without contingencies related to other medical, surgical or endovascular intervention.

⁃ Patient meets at least one of the surgical high-risk criteria listed below.

‣ Anatomic High Risk Inclusion Criteria:

‣ A. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion B. Tandem stenoses \>70% C. High cervical carotid artery stenosis D. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy E. Bilateral carotid artery stenosis requiring treatment within 30 days after index treatment.

‣ F. Hostile Necks which the Investigator deems safe for transcarotid access including but not limited to:

‣ I. Prior neck irradiation II. Radical neck dissection III. Cervical spine immobility

‣ Clinical High Risk Inclusion Criteria:

‣ G. Patient is \> 75 years of age H. Patient has \> 2-vessel coronary artery disease and history of angina of any severity I. Patient has a history of angina

• Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class 3 or 4 or

• unstable angina

‣ J. Patient has congestive heart failure (CHF) - New York Heart Association (NYHA)

• Functional Class III or IV

‣ K. Patient has known severe left ventricular dysfunction

• LVEF \<30%.

‣ L. Patient has had a myocardial infarction \> 72 hours and \< 6 weeks prior to procedure.

‣ M. Patient has severe pulmonary disease (COPD) with either:

• FEV1 \<50% predicted or

• chronic oxygen therapy or

• resting PO2 of \<60 mmHg (room air)

‣ N. Patient has permanent contralateral cranial nerve injury O. Patient has chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL).

‣ REMINDER: The following is a list of anatomical considerations that are not suitable for transfemoral CAS with distal protection that are NOT contraindications for enrollment in the ROADSTER 2 Study including but not limited to:

‣ I. TypeII, III, or Bovine arch II. Arch atheroma or calcification III. Atheroma of the great vessel origins IV. Tortuous distal ICA V. Tortuous or occluded iliofemoral segments VI. Occluded aortoiliac segments

Locations
United States
California
Peter Morton UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles
Washington, D.c.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington
Georgia
Emory Healthcare
Atlanta
Hawaii
Kaiser Permanente, Hawaii
Honolulu
Iowa
Unity Point Health - Iowa Clinic
Des Moines
Indiana
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis
Kentucky
Baptist Health Louisville
Louisville
Massachusetts
Beth Israel
Boston
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Brighton
Maryland
John Hopkins
Baltimore
Maine
Eastern Maine Medical Center
Bangor
Michigan
Michigan Vascular Center
Flint
Minnesota
Abbott Northwestern
Minneapolis
Missouri
Washington University School of Medicine
Saint Louis
North Carolina
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte
New Hampshire
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Ct.
Lebanon
New Mexico
New Mexico
Albuquerque
New York
Albany Medical Center
Albany
Sisters of Charity Hospital
Buffalo
Columbia University Medical Center
New York
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York
New Your Presbytarian - Weill Cornell
New York
University of Rochester
Rochester
Stony Brook Medicine
Stony Brook
Ohio
University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Cleveland
Oklahoma
Oklahoma Heart
Oklahoma City
Pennsylvania
St. Luke's University Health Network
Bethlehem
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia
UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)
Pittsburgh
South Carolina
Greenville Hospital System
Greenville
Tennessee
Wellmont CVA Heart Institute
Kingsport
Texas
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons
Austin
Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
Houston
Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center
Houston
Scott and White Memorial Hospital
Temple
Virginia
Sentara Vascular Specialists
Chesapeake
Washington
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle
Wisconsin
University of Wisconsin
Madison
West Virginia
CAMC Clinical Trials Center
Charleston
Other Locations
Germany
Technical University Munich
Munich
Spain
Hospital Quirónsalud Marbella
Marbella
Time Frame
Start Date: 2015-10-23
Completion Date: 2019-04-29
Participants
Target number of participants: 692
Related Therapeutic Areas
Sponsors
Leads: Silk Road Medical

This content was sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Similar Clinical Trials